OrangeGlow

bueller:

Badu

madriche:

you ain’t fuckin’ wit her dougie

yseasunr:

iwanna-fack:

(via imgTumble)

I wish

soul3sh:

Stevie. Legend.

theyoungabstractionist:

layzidoodle:
“By day, studied the history of music. By night, just to pay for that shit, you danced.”

theyoungabstractionist:

self-portrait, charcoal.

gray37:

Simply Ang
© 2012 Christopher Wilson (by SemperNovus)

lacigreen:

magazines suck and
money makes people crazy

"[F]or the first several years the SAT was offered, males scored higher than females on the Math section but females achieved higher scores on the Verbal section. ETS policy-makers determined that the Verbal test needed to be “balanced” more in favor of males, and added questions pertaining to politics, business and sports to the Verbal portion. Since that time, males have outscored females on both the Math and Verbal sections. Dwyer notes that no similar effort has been made to “balance” the Math section, and concludes that, “It could be done, but it has not been, and I believe that probably an unconscious form of sexism underlies this pattern. When females show the superior performance, ‘balancing’ is required; when males show the superior performance, no adjustments are necessary.” "

▼

“Gender Bias in College Admissions Tests”, FairTest.org. (via vaginawoolf)

We were told our English Lang GCSEs were often about sport or politics because boys often underperformed in that exam. I can’t even fathom the number of things wrong with this kind of thinking.

(via benedictatorship)

i don’t understand how this is “unconscious” they saw numbers of both males and females and only made adjustments for the males. that is pretty damn blatant and conscious to me.

(via strugglingtobeheard)

(Source: fairtest.org, via madriche)